sigma-hse-logo
Search
sigma-hse-logo
Search
sigma-hse-logo
sigma-hse-logo-expanded
sigma-hse-logo-expanded

Our Solutions: Consulting

Consequence Modeling

Consequence Modeling-plant-fire

What is Consequence Modeling

Consequence modeling is a sophisticated analytical technique used to predict and evaluate potential outcomes of hazardous material releases in industrial facilities. This significant safety tool combines mathematical models, engineering principles, and computer simulations to quantify the impacts of scenarios such as toxic gas releases, fires, and explosions.

When a containment system fails—whether it’s a pipeline rupture, tank overflow, or process vessel breach—consequence modeling helps predict how the released material will behave, where it will spread, and what effects it might have on people, equipment, and the environment.

Industries rely on consequence modeling during various stages of the facility lifecycle:

Design Phase: To optimize facility layout, determine safety distances, and specify safety system requirements

Operational Phase: To develop emergency response plans, establish safe working procedures, and validate control measures

Modification Phase: To assess the impact of process changes or facility expansions

Compliance: To meet regulatory requirements and demonstrate due diligence in risk management

How Consequence Modeling Supports Risk Management

Consequence modeling plays a significant role in the risk management process by simulating hazardous scenarios and assessing their impacts. It is applied in various key areas to enhance safety and preparedness:

  • Process Hazard Analysis (PHA): During a PHA, consequence modeling can be used to determine the impact from specific operations or processes.

  • Facility Siting: Determining the impact from operations to occupied buildings.

  • Vent System Assessments: Evaluating the performance of flare and vent systems to prevent escalation during emergency releases.

  • Emergency Planning: Assisting in the design of evacuation, rescue, and recovery plans to protect personnel during hazardous events.

  • Quantitative Risk Assessments (QRAs): Consequence modeling is one of the steps in performing a QRA.

By simulating various hazardous events, consequence modeling provides the insights needed to design safer systems, improve emergency preparedness, and ensure compliance with industry regulations, such as OSHA, EPA, and ISO 45001.

Benefits of Consequence Modeling

Consequence modeling offers several advantages for organizations looking to improve safety and risk management practices:

Improved Risk Management: Early identification of potential hazards and proactive risk reduction.

Enhanced Safety Protocols: Development of targeted emergency response and evacuation plans based on realistic scenarios.

Regulatory Compliance: Assurance that operations meet industry standards and regulatory requirements, such as OSHA, EPA, and ISO.

Cost Reduction: Minimizing the likelihood of accidents, which can lower insurance premiums and prevent costly downtime or legal issues.

Facility Design Optimization: Informed decisions about facility layout, equipment selection, and safety systems to minimize risks.

Industry-Standard Modeling Techniques

PHAST (Process Hazard Analysis Software Tool):  PHAST is widely adopted for comprehensive consequence analysis, specializing in source term characterization, dispersion modeling, and fire/explosion calculations.

EFFECTS: As PHAST, EFFECTS is widely adopted for comprehensive consequence analysis, it was developed by TNO based on the well-recognized Colored Books. It specializes in source term characterization, dispersion modeling, and fire/explosion calculations. Its unified dispersion model handles complex terrain effects and multi-component releases, making it essential for facility-wide risk assessments.

FLACS (FLame ACceleration Simulator):  As a specialized CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) tool, FLACS excels in modeling gas dispersion and explosion scenarios in congested environments. It provides high-fidelity 3D simulations of flame propagation and blast wave interactions with structures and equipment.

FDS (Fire Dynamics Simulator): FDS is focused on fire-specific modeling, utilizing advanced computational techniques for smoke movement prediction and heat transfer analysis. Its capabilities in modeling enclosure fires and ventilation effects make it invaluable for building safety assessments and fire protection system design.

Our Approach to Consequence Modeling

At Sigma-HSE, we follow a structured and systematic approach to consequence modeling, ensuring that our simulations deliver reliable and actionable results. Our process includes:

Site-Based Surveys (Walkdowns): We begin by conducting on-site surveys to assess your facility, identify hazards, and gather the necessary data for precise modeling.

Advanced Consequence Analysis: Using empirical models, we simulate a variety of hazardous scenarios, including:

    • Jet, Pool, and Flash Fire Thermal Radiation Modeling
    • Explosion Overpressure Modeling
    • Flammable Gas, Toxic Gas, and Smoke Dispersion Modeling
    • BLEVE (Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapor Explosion) and Escalation Effects Modeling


Flare and Vent System Studies
: We evaluate flare and vent system performance during emergency releases to minimize risks.

Emergency Planning: We assist in designing escape, evacuation, rescue, and recovery plans to ensure personnel can evacuate safely during an incident.

The Sigma-HSE Advantage

At Sigma-HSE, we provide customized consequence modeling services with decades of experience to help organizations assess and manage the impact of hazardous events. Whether you’re designing a new facility, reviewing existing operations, or ensuring regulatory compliance, our expert team delivers detailed simulations to evaluate risks to people, property, and the environment.

Our approach combines advanced modeling techniques with industry-specific insights to help you develop effective risk mitigation strategies, improve safety protocols, and meet regulatory standards. With practical, cost-effective solutions, we enable you to reduce risks and optimize facility design to enhance safety and operational resilience.

Request a Consequence Modeling Quote

Sigma-HSE uses the contact information provided to contact you. You may unsubscribe from our communications via a link at the bottom of our emails at any time. Our privacy policy and our commitment to the protection of your privacy is outlined in our Privacy Statement.
We would like to share details of our work, webinars you can attend, insights, case studies and fact sheets with you. To do this, we need to hold some of your personal information, including your full name, job title, organisation name and email address.

Frequently asked questions

Consequence modeling is a technique used to assess and predict the outcomes of hazardous events, such as chemical spills, explosions, fires, or toxic gas releases. By simulating these events, it helps organizations evaluate the potential impacts on people, property, and the environment, providing valuable insights for decision-making in safety management, emergency response planning, and regulatory compliance.

Consequence modeling allows businesses to identify potential hazards and evaluate the impact of various emergency scenarios. It enables better risk management, helps in facility design optimization, and improves emergency response planning. With detailed simulations, organizations can proactively address risks and ensure compliance with safety regulations such as OSHA and EPA standards.

Consequence modeling can analyze a wide range of hazardous events, including:

  • Chemical spills or leaks
  • Explosions (e.g., BLEVE – Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapor Explosion)
  • Fires, including jet, pool, and flash fires
  • Toxic gas releases and dispersion
  • Smoke dispersion and the effects of large-scale fires

These events can be simulated to predict their effects on people, property, and the environment.

Consequence modeling is an integral part of process hazard analysis (PHA). It helps quantify the  potential risks, that were  identified in the PHA, by simulating the hazardous events to evaluate their impact. This enables better decision-making when designing safety measures and controls to prevent incidents from occurring.

Consequence modeling is a key tool in process safety management (PSM), helping businesses assess potential risks associated with chemical processes, equipment failures, and operational hazards. By modeling worst-case scenarios, it supports informed decisions regarding risk reduction and safety system design.

While traditional risk assessments often focus on qualitative analysis, consequence modeling offers a quantitative approach by simulating specific hazardous events and predicting their outcomes. This provides more detailed, data-driven insights into potential risks, which can lead to better decision-making.

The timeline for completing a consequence modeling assessment can vary depending on the complexity of the facility, the type of hazards being modeled, and the scope of the project. Typically, it can range from a few weeks to a couple of months, depending on the level of detail required.

Yes, consequence modeling can and is normally  used to investigate past incidents by recreating events and analyzing how different factors contributed to the outcome. This helps organizations identify weaknesses in existing safety protocols and improve future risk management strategies.

Consequence modeling is a step performed in a Qualitative Risk Assessment (QRA). While consequence modeling focuses on simulating specific hazardous events and their impacts, quantitative risk assessment (QRA) evaluates the overall risk by combining the likelihood of events with their consequences. Both methods complement each other to provide a comprehensive approach to risk management.

safety minute HAZID HAZOP

What Our Customers Say

The detail oriented approach of the consultants helped our team in identifying the various risks & hazards involved in different stages of the project and helped us in making design and operational changes at the right time.
Project Engineer
Chemicals Industry
I would like to highlight the prompt and professional response to our enquiry, the quick turnaround time for the tests and report, and the constant communication throughout the process.
Senior Process Development Engineer
Electronics Parts Supplier
I just want to extend my compliments to your technical team for their valuable contributions to the HAZOP. Their feedback was excellent, and the facilitation was outstanding.
Principal Mechanical Engineer
Large Aluminum Manufacturer
Sigma-HSE completed DSEAR assessments for multiple sites around the UK with flawless execution. Considering our flammable chemical inventories, the assessments were crucial in identifying hazardous areas to reduce the risks of explosive atmospheres at our sites.
Site Head of Engineering
Printing Industry
fire-icon

Blog

Understanding the difference between flammability and combustibility

Sparksheet

What is a Dust Hazard Analysis (DHA)?

 

On-demand event: Dust Hazard Assessments: An Introduction-icon

Webinar

Dust Hazard Assessments – An Introduction

Video

Minimum Ignition Test

 

If you find yourself asking ‘Do I need a DHA?’, please get in touch and one of our DHA experts will guide you through any preliminary questions you may have.

For businesses in the EU or UK, or for those wishing to comply with DSEAR/ATEX Directives, please click here to find out more on our dedicated DSEAR Risk Assessment or ATEX Compliance pages.

Identify, mitigate and control your risks via a Dust Hazard Analysis

Protect business, people, workplace and the environment from potentially unsafe equipment in hazardous zones and comply with explosive atmospheres regulations. Learn more about how we can assist you today.

Are you visiting Sigma-HSE from outside your region? Visit your regional site for more relevant process safety solutions.