Our Solutions: Consulting
The structured approach of Layers of Protection Analysis begins by assigning a numerical value to the initiating event frequency for each hazard scenario. This frequency undergoes modification based on enabling event probabilities, such as:
When implementing Layers of Protection Analysis, practitioners examine independent safeguards, which form distinct protection layers within the process. Each safeguard undergoes evaluation based on its probability of failure on demand (PFD), measuring its reliability in preventing or mitigating potential consequences. These independent safeguards work together to create a comprehensive safety system that reduces overall risk.
Layers of Protection Analysis follows a methodical sequence to assess and enhance safety measures. These steps guide organizations through risk evaluation, safeguard assessment, and implementation of protective measures. Each step builds upon the previous one to create a comprehensive safety analysis framework.
LOPA begins by assigning a numerical value to the initiating event frequency for each hazard scenario. This frequency undergoes modification based on enabling event probabilities, such as:
The methodology then examines independent safeguards, which form distinct layers of protection within the process. Each safeguard undergoes evaluation based on its probability of failure on demand (PFD), measuring its reliability in preventing or mitigating potential consequences. These independent safeguards work together to create a comprehensive safety system that reduces the overall risk of hazardous events.
During hazard scenario assessment, Layers of Protection Analysis (LOPA) practitioners calculate the modified risk level by considering:
This calculated risk undergoes comparison with predetermined acceptable risk criteria. When gaps exist between the acceptable and calculated risk levels, safety professionals determine the necessary risk reduction measures. These measures often include implementing additional independent safeguards or enhancing existing protection layers.
The implementation of Layers of Protection Analysis offers several significant advantages:
Standards governing Layers of Protection Analysis align with international safety requirements and industry best practices for Process Hazard Analysis. The methodology incorporates guidance from organizations such as the Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) and the International Society of Automation (ISA). These organizations provide detailed frameworks and technical guidelines that help companies implement effective risk reduction strategies.
The implementation of LOPA follows structured protocols established by multiple international bodies. For example, IEC 61511 standards outline requirements for safety instrumented systems, which form key independent safeguards in many LOPA studies. Additionally, API RP 752 and 753 guidelines address facility siting and personnel protection considerations that often integrate with LOPA assessments.
Many industries use these standards as benchmarks for their safety management systems:
Each industry sector may adapt LOPA requirements to address their specific operational needs while maintaining consistency with established safety principles. Regular updates to these standards ensure that safety practices evolve alongside technological advancements and lessons learned from industry experiences.
Our expert consultants apply a practical strategy that draws on our decades of plant experience and in-depth understanding of published industry norms to perform a LOPA of your facility. We ensure thorough hazard scenario assessment while maintaining alignment with industry standards and regulatory requirements.
Ready to enhance your facility’s safety through expert LOPA implementation? Contact our team today for a consultation. Our specialists will help you identify optimization opportunities and develop effective risk reduction strategies tailored to your needs. Call us at [Phone Number] or fill out our contact form below to get started.
LOPA is a risk assessment methodology that evaluates safeguards in hazard scenarios. It provides a numerical analysis of risks by examining initiating events, enabling factors, and independent protection layers to determine if additional safety measures are needed.
If your facility has conducted a PHA and has scenarios that are high risk, have recommendations that have a high capital cost, or if you’d like to see a more calculated assessment of scenarios, a LOPA allows for a more detailed approach to hazardous scenarios to ensure the risk is appropriately calculated and recommendations meet the level of risk reduction required.
The values used can come from Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) literature, company information on failure rates of equipment, manufacturer ratings for failure on demand, and other literature sources.
While PHA identifies potential hazards and their consequences, LOPA provides a more detailed, quantitative assessment of specific high-risk scenarios identified during the PHA. LOPA helps determine if existing safeguards provide adequate risk reduction.
Organizations typically conduct LOPA studies:
Independent protection layers are safeguards that can prevent or mitigate hazardous events. Each layer must:
LOPA calculates risk reduction by:
A LOPA study requires:
Organizations should review and update their LOPA studies:
If you find yourself asking, ‘Do I need a LOPA at my facility?’, connect with us today. One of our subject matter experts will guide you through any questions you may have.
For businesses in the EU or UK, or for those wishing to comply with DSEAR/ATEX Directives, please click here to find out more on our dedicated DSEAR Risk Assessment or ATEX Compliance pages.
Protect business, people, workplace and the environment from potentially unsafe equipment in hazardous zones and comply with explosive atmospheres regulations. Learn more about how we can assist you today.
Are you visiting Sigma-HSE from outside your region? Visit your regional site for more relevant process safety solutions.