Design of Emergency Relief System Supported by Sigma-HSE Chemical Reaction Hazards Assessment and Vent Sizing Screening

Client Background

The client is a life science and consumer care company, in the process of designing a new chemical reactor for processing four different oils under nitrogen.

Client Problem

Some limited thermal stability knowledge existed on these materials, and further information was necessary to develop a safe process protected with adequately sized emergency relief systems (ERS). Evaluation of the chemical process and clear communication with the client helped to develop a bespoke testing regime to ascertain the worst-case decomposition scenario, complimented by elemental analysis of the decomposition products to improve understanding on the decomposition mechanism under nitrogen.

Client Objectives

To determine the pressure and temperature rise rates, and adiabatic temperature rise of four different oil samples. We subsequently identifed a worst-case scenario to be used in further vent sizing calculations for the development of an ERS.

Testing Overview – What is the Advanced Reactive System Screening Tool (ARSST)?

The ARSST is a pseudo adiabatic calorimeter with a low-phi factor providing accurate pressure and temperature data that can be used to evaluate thermal stability, kinetic behaviour, and perform vent sizing analysis.

Strategy

For the test to be representative of the client’s process, the ARSST test cell was assembled under an inert nitrogen atmosphere and sealed within the containment cell to prevent any unwanted reaction of the samples with oxygen, and replicate the clients process. The ARSST was further pressurised to 200 psi with nitrogen then heated under polynomial control at 2 °C/min to 350 °C. Gases produced from the decomposition were also sampled for compositional analysis.
Sample Preparation within Nitrogen Atmosphere Glovebox

Sigma-HSE found that

The thermal stability data highlighted the potential for exothermic decomposition while under nitrogen, providing temperature, pressure and permanent gas generation data for all four materials. Given the low-phi and pseudo-adiabatic nature of this calorimetric method a safety factor of 20-30 °C was suggested for measured decomposition onsets.
Full analysis of the data, considering also the maximum pressure and temperature rise rates, allowed for the identification of two worst case scenario events for two of the materials.
The results could then be used to identify the worst case material for pressure relief requirements and calculate the vent size for the ERS, supporting the design of a safe process with a clear understanding of the potential risks involved.
Free Technical Webinar: Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) – Hazards, Risks & Safety in Chemical Handling
Register Now
sigma-hse-logo
Are you visiting Sigma-HSE from outside your region? Visit your regional site for more relevant process safety solutions.
North & South America
UK, Europe & Rest of World